When editing more than one setting on a question, you currently have to change the settings on one tab, save, then re-open the edit screen and make the change on the next tab, save again. There should either be a save and continue button or have the application automatically save your changes if you move to a different tab. See vid where I change the question name, then change the font. Only the font change is saved.
The help section that is available is a really good tool, however it appears that the QP software was updated and the screenshots no longer match what the user sees. This can be frustrating trying to find the mentioned button or setting when it has been moved from when the help section was created.
Moderator Comments
Complete. Please click "rate this page" on the help file if you see a screenshot that doesn't match.
Give users the ability to 'abstain' from voting on a particular idea but still show the idea as voted on.
With the vast number of ideas I try to not re-read them, but if there are some that I don't feel strongly about either way I won't vote. Then they still show the vote up or vote down buttons. If there was an option to abstain (think mark as read) that would help me manage Ideascale as a user.
As I make changes to the survey in response to the Drop Out Analysis, it would be nice if I could filter by date so that I can determine if the changes are effective. Currently all of the responses are grouped together...
In the top right corner of QP the current survey you are working with is displayed as you navigate through the various features - often I have to perform the same task (reports, send reminders, etc) with several surveys at the same sitting. Could the current view of just the name of the current survey be modified to a dropdown box of active surveys?
I find myself typically using the same features over and over - and having to click through several levels of menus to get there. If it was possible to build a customizable dashboard where users could put QP links that were important to them or used frequently it would certainlty save a lot of time.
In a survey with multiple questions with validation, I am seeing a significant number of validation errors. If there was a Meta Analysis tool for validation errors similar to the drop out Meta Analysis, I could dive into and determine which questions are causing the errors and focus on fixing those versus trying to guess.
A fantastic idea. I would think it would need to have some tracking funtionality for opt-outs and date sent. To take it one step further, let's say you use the same list to survey a sample of the population every month, but you want to ensure that the same person is not included twice in any 3 month period. If it tracks when they were last sent you could customize your list based on this criteria as well.
Vote Up
Vote Down
Completed
Close